Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro: Specs & Benchmark Comparison
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is developed by Google, while MiMo-V2.6-Pro comes from Xiaomi. Both were released in September 2026. MiMo-V2.6-Pro has a published size of about 1.0 trillion parameters; Google has not disclosed the parameter count of Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber.
We have 4 benchmark results for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and 18 benchmark results for MiMo-V2.6-Pro, but they overlap on a single test: CyberGym, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 94.0% against 86.2%.
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is available through an API at $0.43 per million input tokens with a 1M-token context window. We do not track a hosted API for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber, so pricing and context cannot be compared directly.
| Characteristic | Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Xiaomi | |
| Release Date | September 2, 2026 | September 22, 2026 |
| Parameters | — | 1.0T |
| Multimodal | No | Yes |
| Context (input) | — | 1.0M |
| Input Price / 1M | — | $0.43 |
| Output Price / 1M | — | $0.87 |
| Average Score | 74.6% | 59.7% |
| Benchmarks | ||
| CyberGym | 86.2% | 94.0% |
Visual Benchmark Comparison
Verdict
MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads in 1 out of 2 comparison categories.
Both models show comparable average scores: Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber — 0.7, MiMo-V2.6-Pro — 0.6.
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is newer: released 9/22/2026 vs 9/2/2026.
More About These Models
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for coding — Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
Which model is cheaper — Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
Which has a larger context window — Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
The Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and MiMo-V2.6-Pro comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber or MiMo-V2.6-Pro page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.