Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Terra: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

CharacteristicGemini 3.8 FlashGPT-5.6 Terra
CompanyGoogleOpenAI
Release DateSeptember 2, 2026July 9, 2026
Parameters
MultimodalYesYes
Context (input)1.0M1.1M
Context (output)66K128K
Input Price / 1M$0.75$2.00
Output Price / 1M$3.75$12.00
Average Score0.60.6
Benchmarks
GDP.pdf0.30.2
OSWorld 2.00.60.5
DeepSWE 1.10.70.7
Terminal-Bench 2.10.90.9

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Gemini 3.8 Flash
GPT-5.6 Terra
GDP.pdf0.3 vs 0.2
0.3
0.2
OSWorld 2.00.6 vs 0.5
0.6
0.5
DeepSWE 1.10.7 vs 0.7
0.7
0.7
Terminal-Bench 2.10.9 vs 0.9
0.9
0.9

Verdict

Gemini 3.8 Flash leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Gemini 3.8 Flash — 0.6, GPT-5.6 Terra — 0.6.

API Cost

Gemini 3.8 Flash is 3.1x cheaper: input $0.75/1M vs $2.00/1M tokens.

Context Window

GPT-5.6 Terra supports a larger context: 1M vs 1M tokens.

Recency

Gemini 3.8 Flash is newer: released 9/2/2026 vs 7/9/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Gemini 3.8 Flash or GPT-5.6 Terra?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Gemini 3.8 Flash or GPT-5.6 Terra?
Gemini 3.8 Flash is cheaper for input: $0.75 per 1M tokens vs $2.00.
Which has a larger context window — Gemini 3.8 Flash or GPT-5.6 Terra?
GPT-5.6 Terra supports a larger context: 1,050,000 tokens vs 1,048,576.

The Gemini 3.8 Flash and GPT-5.6 Terra comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Gemini 3.8 Flash or GPT-5.6 Terra page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.