Which is better for coding — GLM-4.5 or GLM-4.7-Flash?

Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.

Which model is cheaper — GLM-4.5 or GLM-4.7-Flash?

GLM-4.7-Flash is cheaper for input: $0.07 per 1M tokens vs $0.60.

Which has a larger context window — GLM-4.5 or GLM-4.7-Flash?

GLM-4.5 supports a larger context: 131,072 tokens vs 128,000.

GLM-4.5 vs GLM-4.7-Flash: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Characteristic	GLM-4.5	GLM-4.7-Flash
Company	Zhipu AI	Zhipu AI
Release Date	July 27, 2025	January 18, 2026
Parameters	355B	30B
Multimodal	No	No
Context (input)	131K	128K
Context (output)	98K	16K
Input Price / 1M	$0.60	$0.07
Output Price / 1M	$2.20	$0.40
Average Score	0.8	0.6
Benchmarks
GPQA	0.8	0.8

Visual Benchmark Comparison

GLM-4.5

GLM-4.7-Flash

GPQA0.8 vs 0.8

0.8

Verdict

GLM-4.7-Flash leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: GLM-4.5 — 0.8, GLM-4.7-Flash — 0.6.

API Cost

GLM-4.7-Flash is 6.0x cheaper: input $0.07/1M vs $0.60/1M tokens.

Context Window

GLM-4.5 supports a larger context: 131K vs 128K tokens.

Recency

GLM-4.7-Flash is newer: released 1/18/2026 vs 7/27/2025.

More About These Models

GLM-4.5

Zhipu AI — specs, benchmarks, API

GLM-4.7-Flash

Zhipu AI — specs, benchmarks, API

Related Comparisons

GLM-4.5 vs GLM-5 DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp vs GLM-4.5 GLM-4.5 vs LongCat-Flash-Thinking DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) vs GLM-4.5 GLM-4.5 vs MiMo-V2-Flash GLM-4.7-Flash vs GLM-5

All model comparisons →

The GLM-4.5 and GLM-4.7-Flash comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the GLM-4.5 or GLM-4.7-Flash page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.