GLM-4.5 vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

CharacteristicGLM-4.5Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
CompanyZhipu AIMeta
Release DateJuly 27, 2025December 6, 2024
Parameters355B70B
MultimodalNoNo
Context (input)131K128K
Context (output)98K128K
Input Price / 1M$0.60$0.88
Output Price / 1M$2.20$0.88
Average Score0.80.8
Benchmarks
GPQA0.80.5
MMLU-Pro0.80.7

Visual Benchmark Comparison

GLM-4.5
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
GPQA0.8 vs 0.5
0.8
0.5
MMLU-Pro0.8 vs 0.7
0.8
0.7

Verdict

GLM-4.5 leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: GLM-4.5 — 0.8, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct — 0.8.

API Cost

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is 1.6x cheaper: input $0.88/1M vs $0.60/1M tokens.

Context Window

GLM-4.5 supports a larger context: 131K vs 128K tokens.

Recency

GLM-4.5 is newer: released 7/27/2025 vs 12/6/2024.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — GLM-4.5 or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — GLM-4.5 or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?
GLM-4.5 is cheaper for input: $0.60 per 1M tokens vs $0.88.
Which has a larger context window — GLM-4.5 or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?
GLM-4.5 supports a larger context: 131,072 tokens vs 128,000.

The GLM-4.5 and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the GLM-4.5 or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.