Which is better for coding — GLM-4.5 or Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking?

Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.

Which model is cheaper — GLM-4.5 or Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking?

API pricing data is available on the individual model pages.

Which has a larger context window — GLM-4.5 or Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking?

Context window data is available on the individual model pages.

GLM-4.5 vs Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

GLM-4.5

Zhipu AI

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Alibaba

Characteristic	GLM-4.5	Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
Company	Zhipu AI	Alibaba
Release Date	July 27, 2025	September 21, 2025
Parameters	355B	33B
Multimodal	No	Yes
Context (input)	131K	—
Context (output)	98K	—
Input Price / 1M	$0.60	—
Output Price / 1M	$2.20	—
Average Score	0.8	144.5

Verdict

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking leads in 2 out of 2 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking shows a higher average benchmark score: 144.5 vs 0.8.

Recency

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is newer: released 9/21/2025 vs 7/27/2025.

More About These Models

GLM-4.5

Zhipu AI — specs, benchmarks, API

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Alibaba — specs, benchmarks, API

Related Comparisons

GLM-4.5 vs GLM-5 GLM-4.5 vs GLM-4.7-Flash DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp vs GLM-4.5 GLM-4.5 vs LongCat-Flash-Thinking DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) vs GLM-4.5 GLM-4.5 vs MiMo-V2-Flash

All model comparisons →

The GLM-4.5 and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the GLM-4.5 or Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.