Which is better for coding — GLM-4.7-Flash or Grok-3 Mini?

Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.

Which model is cheaper — GLM-4.7-Flash or Grok-3 Mini?

GLM-4.7-Flash is cheaper for input: $0.07 per 1M tokens vs $0.30.

Which has a larger context window — GLM-4.7-Flash or Grok-3 Mini?

GLM-4.7-Flash supports a larger context: 128,000 tokens vs 128,000.

GLM-4.7-Flash vs Grok-3 Mini: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Characteristic	GLM-4.7-Flash	Grok-3 Mini
Company	Zhipu AI	xAI
Release Date	January 18, 2026	February 16, 2025
Parameters	30B	—
Multimodal	No	Yes
Context (input)	128K	128K
Context (output)	16K	8K
Input Price / 1M	$0.07	$0.30
Output Price / 1M	$0.40	$0.50
Average Score	0.6	0.9
Benchmarks
GPQA	0.8	0.8
AIME 2025	0.9	0.9

Visual Benchmark Comparison

GLM-4.7-Flash

Grok-3 Mini

GPQA0.8 vs 0.8

0.8

AIME 20250.9 vs 0.9

0.9

Verdict

GLM-4.7-Flash leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: GLM-4.7-Flash — 0.6, Grok-3 Mini — 0.9.

API Cost

GLM-4.7-Flash is 1.7x cheaper: input $0.07/1M vs $0.30/1M tokens.

Context Window

Same context size: 128K tokens.

Recency

GLM-4.7-Flash is newer: released 1/18/2026 vs 2/16/2025.

More About These Models

GLM-4.7-Flash

Zhipu AI — specs, benchmarks, API

Grok-3 Mini

xAI — specs, benchmarks, API

Related Comparisons

GLM-4.7-Flash vs GLM-5 GLM-4.5 vs GLM-4.7-Flash GLM-4.7-Flash vs GPT-5.2 Codex GLM-4.7-Flash vs Mercury 2 GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniMax M2.5 GLM-4.7-Flash vs GPT-5.3 Codex

All model comparisons →

The GLM-4.7-Flash and Grok-3 Mini comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the GLM-4.7-Flash or Grok-3 Mini page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.