Which is better for coding — GLM-4.7-Flash or Qwen3 235B A22B?

Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.

Which model is cheaper — GLM-4.7-Flash or Qwen3 235B A22B?

GLM-4.7-Flash is cheaper for input: $0.07 per 1M tokens vs $0.20.

Which has a larger context window — GLM-4.7-Flash or Qwen3 235B A22B?

GLM-4.7-Flash supports a larger context: 128,000 tokens vs 128,000.

GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3 235B A22B: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Characteristic	GLM-4.7-Flash	Qwen3 235B A22B
Company	Zhipu AI	Alibaba
Release Date	January 18, 2026	April 28, 2025
Parameters	30B	235B
Multimodal	No	No
Context (input)	128K	128K
Context (output)	16K	128K
Input Price / 1M	$0.07	$0.20
Output Price / 1M	$0.40	$0.60
Average Score	0.6	0.9

Verdict

GLM-4.7-Flash leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: GLM-4.7-Flash — 0.6, Qwen3 235B A22B — 0.9.

API Cost

GLM-4.7-Flash is 1.7x cheaper: input $0.07/1M vs $0.20/1M tokens.

Context Window

Same context size: 128K tokens.

Recency

GLM-4.7-Flash is newer: released 1/18/2026 vs 4/28/2025.

More About These Models

GLM-4.7-Flash

Zhipu AI — specs, benchmarks, API

Qwen3 235B A22B

Alibaba — specs, benchmarks, API

Related Comparisons

GLM-4.7-Flash vs GLM-5 GLM-4.5 vs GLM-4.7-Flash GLM-4.7-Flash vs GPT-5.2 Codex GLM-4.7-Flash vs Mercury 2 GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniMax M2.5 GLM-4.7-Flash vs GPT-5.3 Codex

All model comparisons →

The GLM-4.7-Flash and Qwen3 235B A22B comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the GLM-4.7-Flash or Qwen3 235B A22B page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.