Which is better for coding — GLM-4.7-Flash or Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct?

Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.

Which model is cheaper — GLM-4.7-Flash or Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct?

GLM-4.7-Flash is cheaper for input: $0.07 per 1M tokens vs $0.15.

Which has a larger context window — GLM-4.7-Flash or Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct?

GLM-4.7-Flash supports a larger context: 128,000 tokens vs 65,536.

GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

GLM-4.7-Flash

Zhipu AI

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct

Alibaba

Characteristic	GLM-4.7-Flash	Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct
Company	Zhipu AI	Alibaba
Release Date	January 18, 2026	September 9, 2025
Parameters	30B	80B
Multimodal	No	No
Context (input)	128K	66K
Context (output)	16K	66K
Input Price / 1M	$0.07	$0.15
Output Price / 1M	$0.40	$1.50
Average Score	0.6	0.9

Verdict

GLM-4.7-Flash leads in 3 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: GLM-4.7-Flash — 0.6, Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct — 0.9.

API Cost

GLM-4.7-Flash is 3.5x cheaper: input $0.07/1M vs $0.15/1M tokens.

Context Window

GLM-4.7-Flash supports a larger context: 128K vs 66K tokens.

Recency

GLM-4.7-Flash is newer: released 1/18/2026 vs 9/9/2025.

More About These Models

GLM-4.7-Flash

Zhipu AI — specs, benchmarks, API

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct

Alibaba — specs, benchmarks, API

Related Comparisons

GLM-4.7-Flash vs GLM-5 GLM-4.5 vs GLM-4.7-Flash GLM-4.7-Flash vs GPT-5.2 Codex GLM-4.7-Flash vs Mercury 2 GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniMax M2.5 GLM-4.7-Flash vs GPT-5.3 Codex

All model comparisons →

The GLM-4.7-Flash and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the GLM-4.7-Flash or Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.