Which is better for coding — GLM-4.7-Flash or Qwen3.5 35B A3B?

Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.

Which model is cheaper — GLM-4.7-Flash or Qwen3.5 35B A3B?

API pricing data is available on the individual model pages.

Which has a larger context window — GLM-4.7-Flash or Qwen3.5 35B A3B?

Context window data is available on the individual model pages.

GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.5 35B A3B: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Characteristic	GLM-4.7-Flash	Qwen3.5 35B A3B
Company	Zhipu AI	Alibaba
Release Date	January 18, 2026	March 1, 2026
Parameters	30B	35B
Multimodal	No	No
Context (input)	128K	—
Context (output)	16K	—
Input Price / 1M	$0.07	—
Output Price / 1M	$0.40	—
Average Score	0.6	0.9

Verdict

Qwen3.5 35B A3B leads in 1 out of 2 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: GLM-4.7-Flash — 0.6, Qwen3.5 35B A3B — 0.9.

Recency

Qwen3.5 35B A3B is newer: released 3/1/2026 vs 1/18/2026.

More About These Models

GLM-4.7-Flash

Zhipu AI — specs, benchmarks, API

Qwen3.5 35B A3B

Alibaba — specs, benchmarks, API

Related Comparisons

GLM-4.7-Flash vs GLM-5 GLM-4.5 vs GLM-4.7-Flash GLM-4.7-Flash vs GPT-5.2 Codex GLM-4.7-Flash vs Mercury 2 GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniMax M2.5 GLM-4.7-Flash vs GPT-5.3 Codex

All model comparisons →

The GLM-4.7-Flash and Qwen3.5 35B A3B comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the GLM-4.7-Flash or Qwen3.5 35B A3B page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.