GLM-4.7-Flash vs Step-3.5-Flash: Specs & Benchmark Comparison
| Characteristic | GLM-4.7-Flash | Step-3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Zhipu AI | StepFun |
| Release Date | January 18, 2026 | February 1, 2026 |
| Parameters | 30B | 196B |
| Multimodal | No | Yes |
| Context (input) | 128K | 66K |
| Context (output) | 16K | 8K |
| Input Price / 1M | $0.07 | $0.10 |
| Output Price / 1M | $0.40 | $0.40 |
| Average Score | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Benchmarks | ||
| BrowseComp | 0.4 | 0.7 |
| SWE-Bench Verified | 0.6 | 0.7 |
| TAU-Bench | 0.8 | 0.9 |
| AIME 2025 | 0.9 | 1.0 |
Visual Benchmark Comparison
GLM-4.7-Flash
Step-3.5-Flash
BrowseComp0.4 vs 0.7
0.4
0.7
SWE-Bench Verified0.6 vs 0.7
0.6
0.7
TAU-Bench0.8 vs 0.9
0.8
0.9
AIME 20250.9 vs 1.0
0.9
1.0
Verdict
GLM-4.7-Flash leads in 2 out of 5 comparison categories.
Overall Performance
Both models show comparable average scores: GLM-4.7-Flash — 0.6, Step-3.5-Flash — 0.8.
Programming
On SWE-Bench, both models are nearly equal: GLM-4.7-Flash — 0.6, Step-3.5-Flash — 0.7.
API Cost
GLM-4.7-Flash is 1.1x cheaper: input $0.07/1M vs $0.10/1M tokens.
Context Window
GLM-4.7-Flash supports a larger context: 128K vs 66K tokens.
Recency
Step-3.5-Flash is newer: released 2/1/2026 vs 1/18/2026.
More About These Models
Related Comparisons
The GLM-4.7-Flash and Step-3.5-Flash comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the GLM-4.7-Flash or Step-3.5-Flash page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.