GLM-5.2 vs GPT-5.6 Luna: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

CharacteristicGLM-5.2GPT-5.6 Luna
CompanyZhipu AIOpenAI
Release DateJune 16, 2026July 9, 2026
Parameters753B
MultimodalNoYes
Context (input)1.0M1.1M
Context (output)131K128K
Input Price / 1M$1.40$0.20
Output Price / 1M$4.40$1.20
Average Score0.90.5
Benchmarks
GPQA0.90.9

Visual Benchmark Comparison

GLM-5.2
GPT-5.6 Luna
GPQA0.9 vs 0.9
0.9
0.9

Verdict

GPT-5.6 Luna leads in 3 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: GLM-5.2 — 0.9, GPT-5.6 Luna — 0.5.

API Cost

GPT-5.6 Luna is 4.1x cheaper: input $0.20/1M vs $1.40/1M tokens.

Context Window

GPT-5.6 Luna supports a larger context: 1M vs 1M tokens.

Recency

GPT-5.6 Luna is newer: released 7/9/2026 vs 6/16/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — GLM-5.2 or GPT-5.6 Luna?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — GLM-5.2 or GPT-5.6 Luna?
GPT-5.6 Luna is cheaper for input: $0.20 per 1M tokens vs $1.40.
Which has a larger context window — GLM-5.2 or GPT-5.6 Luna?
GPT-5.6 Luna supports a larger context: 1,050,000 tokens vs 1,000,000.

The GLM-5.2 and GPT-5.6 Luna comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the GLM-5.2 or GPT-5.6 Luna page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.