GLM-5.2 vs Kimi K2.5: Specs & Benchmark Comparison
| Characteristic | GLM-5.2 | Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Zhipu AI | Moonshot AI |
| Release Date | June 16, 2026 | January 26, 2026 |
| Parameters | 753B | 1.0T |
| Multimodal | No | Yes |
| Context (input) | 1.0M | — |
| Context (output) | 131K | — |
| Input Price / 1M | $1.40 | — |
| Output Price / 1M | $4.40 | — |
| Average Score | 0.9 | 0.9 |
| Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 0.9 | 0.9 |
| HMMT 2025 | 0.9 | 0.9 |
Visual Benchmark Comparison
GLM-5.2
Kimi K2.5
GPQA0.9 vs 0.9
0.9
0.9
HMMT 20250.9 vs 0.9
0.9
0.9
Verdict
GLM-5.2 leads in 1 out of 2 comparison categories.
Overall Performance
Both models show comparable average scores: GLM-5.2 — 0.9, Kimi K2.5 — 0.9.
Recency
GLM-5.2 is newer: released 6/16/2026 vs 1/26/2026.
More About These Models
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for coding — GLM-5.2 or Kimi K2.5?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — GLM-5.2 or Kimi K2.5?
API pricing data is available on the individual model pages.
Which has a larger context window — GLM-5.2 or Kimi K2.5?
Context window data is available on the individual model pages.
The GLM-5.2 and Kimi K2.5 comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the GLM-5.2 or Kimi K2.5 page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.