GLM-5.2 vs Laguna S 2.1: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

GLM-5.2 is developed by Zhipu AI, while Laguna S 2.1 comes from Poolside. GLM-5.2 was released in June 2026, and Laguna S 2.1 followed a month later in July 2026. GLM-5.2 is the larger model at roughly 753 billion parameters, against 118 billion for Laguna S 2.1.

The two models share 4 published benchmarks. GLM-5.2 leads on 3 of them, Laguna S 2.1 on 1. The widest gaps are on Terminal-Bench 2.1, where GLM-5.2 scores 82.7% against 70.2%; DeepSWE 1.1, where GLM-5.2 scores 44.0% against 40.4%. Averaged across everything we track, GLM-5.2 sits at 60.9% and Laguna S 2.1 at 57.4%.

Laguna S 2.1 is the cheaper API at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens, roughly 14 times cheaper than GLM-5.2 at $1.40 and $4.40. Both accept a context window of about 1M tokens. On tooling, only GLM-5.2 supports function calling and only GLM-5.2 offers structured output.

CharacteristicGLM-5.2Laguna S 2.1
CompanyZhipu AIPoolside
Release DateJune 16, 2026July 21, 2026
Parameters753B118B
MultimodalNoNo
Context (input)1.0M1.0M
Context (output)131K
Input Price / 1M$1.40$0.10
Output Price / 1M$4.40$0.20
Average Score60.9%57.4%
Benchmarks
Terminal-Bench 2.182.7%70.2%
DeepSWE 1.144.0%40.4%
SWE-Bench Pro62.1%59.4%
Toolathlon48.2%49.7%

Visual Benchmark Comparison

GLM-5.2
Laguna S 2.1
Terminal-Bench 2.10.8 vs 0.7
0.8
0.7
DeepSWE 1.10.4 vs 0.4
0.4
0.4
SWE-Bench Pro0.6 vs 0.6
0.6
0.6
Toolathlon0.5 vs 0.5
0.5
0.5

Verdict

Laguna S 2.1 leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: GLM-5.2 — 0.6, Laguna S 2.1 — 0.6.

API Cost

Laguna S 2.1 is 19.3x cheaper: input $0.10/1M vs $1.40/1M tokens.

Context Window

Same context size: 1M tokens.

Recency

Laguna S 2.1 is newer: released 7/21/2026 vs 6/16/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — GLM-5.2 or Laguna S 2.1?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — GLM-5.2 or Laguna S 2.1?
Laguna S 2.1 is cheaper for input: $0.10 per 1M tokens vs $1.40.
Which has a larger context window — GLM-5.2 or Laguna S 2.1?
GLM-5.2 supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 1,048,576.

The GLM-5.2 and Laguna S 2.1 comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the GLM-5.2 or Laguna S 2.1 page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.