GLM-5.2 vs Muse Glimmer-30B: Specs & Benchmark Comparison
GLM-5.2 is developed by Zhipu AI, while Muse Glimmer-30B comes from Meta. GLM-5.2 was released in June 2026, and Muse Glimmer-30B followed 2 months later in August 2026. GLM-5.2 is the larger model at roughly 753 billion parameters, against 30 billion for Muse Glimmer-30B.
The two models share 2 published benchmarks. GLM-5.2 leads on 2 of them. The widest gaps are on GPQA, where GLM-5.2 scores 91.0% against 83.5%; AIME 2026, where GLM-5.2 scores 99.0% against 94.7%. Averaged across everything we track, GLM-5.2 sits at 94.3% and Muse Glimmer-30B at 65.1%.
GLM-5.2 is available through an API at $1.40 per million input tokens with a 1M-token context window. We do not track a hosted API for Muse Glimmer-30B, so pricing and context cannot be compared directly.
| Characteristic | GLM-5.2 | Muse Glimmer-30B |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Zhipu AI | Meta |
| Release Date | June 16, 2026 | August 10, 2026 |
| Parameters | 753B | 30B |
| Multimodal | No | Yes |
| Context (input) | 1.0M | — |
| Context (output) | 131K | — |
| Input Price / 1M | $1.40 | — |
| Output Price / 1M | $4.40 | — |
| Average Score | 94.3% | 65.1% |
| Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 91.0% | 83.5% |
| AIME 2026 | 99.0% | 94.7% |
Visual Benchmark Comparison
Verdict
Muse Glimmer-30B leads in 1 out of 2 comparison categories.
Both models show comparable average scores: GLM-5.2 — 0.9, Muse Glimmer-30B — 0.7.
Muse Glimmer-30B is newer: released 8/10/2026 vs 6/16/2026.
More About These Models
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for coding — GLM-5.2 or Muse Glimmer-30B?
Which model is cheaper — GLM-5.2 or Muse Glimmer-30B?
Which has a larger context window — GLM-5.2 or Muse Glimmer-30B?
The GLM-5.2 and Muse Glimmer-30B comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the GLM-5.2 or Muse Glimmer-30B page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.