GLM-5.2 vs Muse Glimmer-30B: Specs & Benchmark Comparison
| Characteristic | GLM-5.2 | Muse Glimmer-30B |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Zhipu AI | Meta |
| Release Date | June 16, 2026 | August 10, 2026 |
| Parameters | 753B | 30B |
| Multimodal | No | Yes |
| Context (input) | 1.0M | — |
| Context (output) | 131K | — |
| Input Price / 1M | $1.40 | — |
| Output Price / 1M | $4.40 | — |
| Average Score | 0.9 | 0.7 |
| Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 0.9 | 0.8 |
| AIME 2026 | 1.0 | 0.9 |
Visual Benchmark Comparison
GLM-5.2
Muse Glimmer-30B
GPQA0.9 vs 0.8
0.9
0.8
AIME 20261.0 vs 0.9
1.0
0.9
Verdict
Muse Glimmer-30B leads in 1 out of 2 comparison categories.
Overall Performance
Both models show comparable average scores: GLM-5.2 — 0.9, Muse Glimmer-30B — 0.7.
Recency
Muse Glimmer-30B is newer: released 8/10/2026 vs 6/16/2026.
More About These Models
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for coding — GLM-5.2 or Muse Glimmer-30B?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — GLM-5.2 or Muse Glimmer-30B?
API pricing data is available on the individual model pages.
Which has a larger context window — GLM-5.2 or Muse Glimmer-30B?
Context window data is available on the individual model pages.
The GLM-5.2 and Muse Glimmer-30B comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the GLM-5.2 or Muse Glimmer-30B page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.