GLM-5.2 vs Muse Spark 1.1: Specs & Benchmark Comparison
| Characteristic | GLM-5.2 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Zhipu AI | Meta |
| Release Date | June 16, 2026 | July 9, 2026 |
| Parameters | 753B | — |
| Multimodal | No | Yes |
| Context (input) | 1.0M | 1.0M |
| Context (output) | 131K | 131K |
| Input Price / 1M | $1.40 | $1.25 |
| Output Price / 1M | $4.40 | $4.25 |
| Average Score | 0.9 | 0.8 |
Verdict
Muse Spark 1.1 leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.
Overall Performance
Both models show comparable average scores: GLM-5.2 — 0.9, Muse Spark 1.1 — 0.8.
API Cost
Muse Spark 1.1 is 1.1x cheaper: input $1.25/1M vs $1.40/1M tokens.
Context Window
Same context size: 1M tokens.
Recency
Muse Spark 1.1 is newer: released 7/9/2026 vs 6/16/2026.
More About These Models
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for coding — GLM-5.2 or Muse Spark 1.1?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — GLM-5.2 or Muse Spark 1.1?
Muse Spark 1.1 is cheaper for input: $1.25 per 1M tokens vs $1.40.
Which has a larger context window — GLM-5.2 or Muse Spark 1.1?
GLM-5.2 supports a larger context: 1,000,000 tokens vs 1,000,000.
The GLM-5.2 and Muse Spark 1.1 comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the GLM-5.2 or Muse Spark 1.1 page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.