GLM-5.2 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B): Specs & Benchmark Comparison

GLM-5.2 is developed by Zhipu AI, while Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) comes from NVIDIA. GLM-5.2 was released in June 2026, and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) followed 2 months later in August 2026. GLM-5.2 is the larger model at roughly 753 billion parameters, against 30 billion for Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B).

We have 4 benchmark results for GLM-5.2 and 4 benchmark results for Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B), but they overlap on a single test: GPQA, where GLM-5.2 scores 91.0% against 75.0%.

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) is the cheaper API at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens, roughly 28 times cheaper than GLM-5.2 at $1.40 and $4.40. GLM-5.2 takes the larger context window at 1M tokens, compared with 262K for Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B).

CharacteristicGLM-5.2Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B)
CompanyZhipu AINVIDIA
Release DateJune 16, 2026August 11, 2026
Parameters753B30B
MultimodalNoNo
Context (input)1.0M262K
Context (output)131K262K
Input Price / 1M$1.40$0.05
Output Price / 1M$4.40$0.20
Average Score94.3%78.5%
Benchmarks
GPQA91.0%75.0%

Visual Benchmark Comparison

GLM-5.2
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B)
GPQA0.9 vs 0.8
0.9
0.8

Verdict

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: GLM-5.2 — 0.9, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) — 0.8.

API Cost

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) is 23.2x cheaper: input $0.05/1M vs $1.40/1M tokens.

Context Window

GLM-5.2 supports a larger context: 1M vs 262K tokens.

Recency

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) is newer: released 8/11/2026 vs 6/16/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — GLM-5.2 or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B)?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — GLM-5.2 or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B)?
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) is cheaper for input: $0.05 per 1M tokens vs $1.40.
Which has a larger context window — GLM-5.2 or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B)?
GLM-5.2 supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 262,100.

The GLM-5.2 and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the GLM-5.2 or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.