GLM-5.2 vs Qwen3.8 Flash: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

GLM-5.2 is developed by Zhipu AI, while Qwen3.8 Flash comes from Alibaba. GLM-5.2 was released in June 2026, and Qwen3.8 Flash followed 2 months later in August 2026. GLM-5.2 is the larger model at roughly 753 billion parameters, against 125 billion for Qwen3.8 Flash.

The two models share 6 published benchmarks. Qwen3.8 Flash leads on 4 of them, GLM-5.2 on 2. The widest gaps are on Toolathlon, where Qwen3.8 Flash scores 73.5% against 48.2%; Humanity's Last Exam, where GLM-5.2 scores 54.7% against 35.9%. Averaged across everything we track, GLM-5.2 sits at 60.9% and Qwen3.8 Flash at 68.5%.

Qwen3.8 Flash is the cheaper API at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.47 per million output tokens, roughly 9 times cheaper than GLM-5.2 at $1.40 and $4.40. Both accept a context window of about 1M tokens. GLM-5.2 accepts text as input, while Qwen3.8 Flash accepts text, images, and video. On tooling, only GLM-5.2 supports function calling and only GLM-5.2 offers structured output.

CharacteristicGLM-5.2Qwen3.8 Flash
CompanyZhipu AIAlibaba
Release DateJune 16, 2026August 26, 2026
Parameters753B125B
MultimodalNoYes
Context (input)1.0M1.0M
Context (output)131K131K
Input Price / 1M$1.40$0.15
Output Price / 1M$4.40$0.47
Average Score60.9%68.5%
Benchmarks
Toolathlon48.2%73.5%
Humanity's Last Exam54.7%35.9%
DeepSWE 1.144.0%58.7%
NL2Repo48.9%48.1%
GPQA91.0%91.7%
SWE-Bench Pro62.1%62.5%

Visual Benchmark Comparison

GLM-5.2
Qwen3.8 Flash
Toolathlon0.5 vs 0.7
0.5
0.7
Humanity's Last Exam0.5 vs 0.4
0.5
0.4
DeepSWE 1.10.4 vs 0.6
0.4
0.6
NL2Repo0.5 vs 0.5
0.5
0.5
GPQA0.9 vs 0.9
0.9
0.9
SWE-Bench Pro0.6 vs 0.6
0.6
0.6

Verdict

Qwen3.8 Flash leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: GLM-5.2 — 0.6, Qwen3.8 Flash — 0.7.

API Cost

Qwen3.8 Flash is 9.4x cheaper: input $0.15/1M vs $1.40/1M tokens.

Context Window

Same context size: 1M tokens.

Recency

Qwen3.8 Flash is newer: released 8/26/2026 vs 6/16/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — GLM-5.2 or Qwen3.8 Flash?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — GLM-5.2 or Qwen3.8 Flash?
Qwen3.8 Flash is cheaper for input: $0.15 per 1M tokens vs $1.40.
Which has a larger context window — GLM-5.2 or Qwen3.8 Flash?
GLM-5.2 supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 1,048,576.

The GLM-5.2 and Qwen3.8 Flash comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the GLM-5.2 or Qwen3.8 Flash page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.