GLM-5.2 vs Sakana Namazu: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

GLM-5.2 is developed by Zhipu AI, while Sakana Namazu comes from Sakana AI. GLM-5.2 was released in June 2026, and Sakana Namazu followed 2 months later in August 2026. GLM-5.2 has a published size of about 753 billion parameters; Sakana AI has not disclosed the parameter count of Sakana Namazu.

We have 19 benchmark results for GLM-5.2 and 3 benchmark results for Sakana Namazu, but they overlap on a single test: AIME 2026, where GLM-5.2 scores 99.0% against 96.7%.

Sakana Namazu is the cheaper API at $0.95 per million input tokens and $4 per million output tokens, about 47% below GLM-5.2 at $1.40 and $4.40. GLM-5.2 takes the larger context window at 1M tokens, compared with 256K for Sakana Namazu. GLM-5.2 accepts text as input, while Sakana Namazu accepts text and images. On tooling, only GLM-5.2 supports function calling and only GLM-5.2 offers structured output.

CharacteristicGLM-5.2Sakana Namazu
CompanyZhipu AISakana AI
Release DateJune 16, 2026August 3, 2026
Parameters753B
MultimodalNoYes
Context (input)1.0M256K
Context (output)131K256K
Input Price / 1M$1.40$0.95
Output Price / 1M$4.40$4.00
Average Score60.9%92.4%
Benchmarks
AIME 202699.0%96.7%

Visual Benchmark Comparison

GLM-5.2
Sakana Namazu
AIME 20261.0 vs 1.0
1.0
1.0

Verdict

Sakana Namazu leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: GLM-5.2 — 0.6, Sakana Namazu — 0.9.

API Cost

Sakana Namazu is 1.2x cheaper: input $0.95/1M vs $1.40/1M tokens.

Context Window

GLM-5.2 supports a larger context: 1M vs 256K tokens.

Recency

Sakana Namazu is newer: released 8/3/2026 vs 6/16/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — GLM-5.2 or Sakana Namazu?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — GLM-5.2 or Sakana Namazu?
Sakana Namazu is cheaper for input: $0.95 per 1M tokens vs $1.40.
Which has a larger context window — GLM-5.2 or Sakana Namazu?
GLM-5.2 supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 256,000.

The GLM-5.2 and Sakana Namazu comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the GLM-5.2 or Sakana Namazu page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.