GLM-5.2 vs Seed 2.0 Pro: Specs & Benchmark Comparison
.svg?dpl=dpl_Ee1bFjstgA6E69BkH9eMGKm3Ri2A){kind=icon}
| Characteristic | GLM-5.2 | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Zhipu AI | ByteDance |
| Release Date | June 16, 2026 | February 14, 2026 |
| Parameters | 753B | — |
| Multimodal | No | Yes |
| Context (input) | 1.0M | 256K |
| Context (output) | 131K | 66K |
| Input Price / 1M | $1.40 | $0.50 |
| Output Price / 1M | $4.40 | $3.00 |
| Average Score | 0.9 | 0.9 |
| Benchmarks | ||
| AIME 2026 | 1.0 | 0.9 |
| GPQA | 0.9 | 0.9 |
Visual Benchmark Comparison
GLM-5.2
Seed 2.0 Pro
AIME 20261.0 vs 0.9
1.0
0.9
GPQA0.9 vs 0.9
0.9
0.9
Verdict
GLM-5.2 leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.
Overall Performance
Both models show comparable average scores: GLM-5.2 — 0.9, Seed 2.0 Pro — 0.9.
API Cost
Seed 2.0 Pro is 1.7x cheaper: input $0.50/1M vs $1.40/1M tokens.
Context Window
GLM-5.2 supports a larger context: 1M vs 256K tokens.
Recency
GLM-5.2 is newer: released 6/16/2026 vs 2/14/2026.
More About These Models
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for coding — GLM-5.2 or Seed 2.0 Pro?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — GLM-5.2 or Seed 2.0 Pro?
Seed 2.0 Pro is cheaper for input: $0.50 per 1M tokens vs $1.40.
Which has a larger context window — GLM-5.2 or Seed 2.0 Pro?
GLM-5.2 supports a larger context: 1,000,000 tokens vs 256,000.
The GLM-5.2 and Seed 2.0 Pro comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the GLM-5.2 or Seed 2.0 Pro page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.