GLM-5.3 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Sol: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

CharacteristicGLM-5.3 FlashGPT-5.6 Sol
CompanyZhipu AIOpenAI
Release DateAugust 26, 2026July 9, 2026
Parameters320B
MultimodalYesYes
Context (input)1.0M1.1M
Context (output)131K128K
Input Price / 1M$0.15$5.00
Output Price / 1M$0.50$30.00
Average Score0.60.6
Benchmarks
AutomationBench v1.0.60.50.2
Agents' Last Exam0.30.5
Toolathlon Verified0.80.6
DeepSWE 1.10.60.7
Terminal-Bench 2.10.80.9

Visual Benchmark Comparison

GLM-5.3 Flash
GPT-5.6 Sol
AutomationBench v1.0.60.5 vs 0.2
0.5
0.2
Agents' Last Exam0.3 vs 0.5
0.3
0.5
Toolathlon Verified0.8 vs 0.6
0.8
0.6
DeepSWE 1.10.6 vs 0.7
0.6
0.7
Terminal-Bench 2.10.8 vs 0.9
0.8
0.9

Verdict

GLM-5.3 Flash leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: GLM-5.3 Flash — 0.6, GPT-5.6 Sol — 0.6.

API Cost

GLM-5.3 Flash is 53.8x cheaper: input $0.15/1M vs $5.00/1M tokens.

Context Window

GPT-5.6 Sol supports a larger context: 1M vs 1M tokens.

Recency

GLM-5.3 Flash is newer: released 8/26/2026 vs 7/9/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — GLM-5.3 Flash or GPT-5.6 Sol?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — GLM-5.3 Flash or GPT-5.6 Sol?
GLM-5.3 Flash is cheaper for input: $0.15 per 1M tokens vs $5.00.
Which has a larger context window — GLM-5.3 Flash or GPT-5.6 Sol?
GPT-5.6 Sol supports a larger context: 1,050,000 tokens vs 1,048,576.

The GLM-5.3 Flash and GPT-5.6 Sol comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the GLM-5.3 Flash or GPT-5.6 Sol page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.