GLM-5.3 Flash vs GPT-6 Astra: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

CharacteristicGLM-5.3 FlashGPT-6 Astra
CompanyZhipu AIOpenAI
Release DateAugust 26, 2026September 3, 2026
Parameters320B
MultimodalYesYes
Context (input)1.0M1.1M
Context (output)131K128K
Input Price / 1M$0.15$10.00
Output Price / 1M$0.50$50.00
Average Score0.60.7
Benchmarks
Agents' Last Exam0.30.6
DeepSWE 1.10.60.7
AutomationBench v1.0.60.50.4

Visual Benchmark Comparison

GLM-5.3 Flash
GPT-6 Astra
Agents' Last Exam0.3 vs 0.6
0.3
0.6
DeepSWE 1.10.6 vs 0.7
0.6
0.7
AutomationBench v1.0.60.5 vs 0.4
0.5
0.4

Verdict

Both models show equal results — the choice depends on your specific use case.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: GLM-5.3 Flash — 0.6, GPT-6 Astra — 0.7.

API Cost

GLM-5.3 Flash is 92.3x cheaper: input $0.15/1M vs $10.00/1M tokens.

Context Window

GPT-6 Astra supports a larger context: 1M vs 1M tokens.

Recency

Both models were released around the same time: 8/26/2026 and 9/3/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — GLM-5.3 Flash or GPT-6 Astra?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — GLM-5.3 Flash or GPT-6 Astra?
GLM-5.3 Flash is cheaper for input: $0.15 per 1M tokens vs $10.00.
Which has a larger context window — GLM-5.3 Flash or GPT-6 Astra?
GPT-6 Astra supports a larger context: 1,050,000 tokens vs 1,048,576.

The GLM-5.3 Flash and GPT-6 Astra comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the GLM-5.3 Flash or GPT-6 Astra page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.