GLM-5.3 Flash vs Grok 4.5: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

CharacteristicGLM-5.3 FlashGrok 4.5
CompanyZhipu AIxAI
Release DateAugust 26, 2026July 16, 2026
Parameters320B
MultimodalYesYes
Context (input)1.0M500K
Context (output)131K
Input Price / 1M$0.15$2.00
Output Price / 1M$0.50$6.00
Average Score0.60.8
Benchmarks
Terminal-Bench 2.10.80.8

Visual Benchmark Comparison

GLM-5.3 Flash
Grok 4.5
Terminal-Bench 2.10.8 vs 0.8
0.8
0.8

Verdict

GLM-5.3 Flash leads in 3 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: GLM-5.3 Flash — 0.6, Grok 4.5 — 0.8.

API Cost

GLM-5.3 Flash is 12.3x cheaper: input $0.15/1M vs $2.00/1M tokens.

Context Window

GLM-5.3 Flash supports a larger context: 1M vs 500K tokens.

Recency

GLM-5.3 Flash is newer: released 8/26/2026 vs 7/16/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — GLM-5.3 Flash or Grok 4.5?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — GLM-5.3 Flash or Grok 4.5?
GLM-5.3 Flash is cheaper for input: $0.15 per 1M tokens vs $2.00.
Which has a larger context window — GLM-5.3 Flash or Grok 4.5?
GLM-5.3 Flash supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 500,000.

The GLM-5.3 Flash and Grok 4.5 comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the GLM-5.3 Flash or Grok 4.5 page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.