GLM-5.3 Flash vs Grok 4.6: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

CharacteristicGLM-5.3 FlashGrok 4.6
CompanyZhipu AIxAI
Release DateAugust 26, 2026August 12, 2026
Parameters320B
MultimodalYesYes
Context (input)1.0M500K
Context (output)131K
Input Price / 1M$0.15$2.00
Output Price / 1M$0.50$6.00
Average Score0.60.6
Benchmarks
DeepSWE 1.10.60.7

Visual Benchmark Comparison

GLM-5.3 Flash
Grok 4.6
DeepSWE 1.10.6 vs 0.7
0.6
0.7

Verdict

GLM-5.3 Flash leads in 3 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: GLM-5.3 Flash — 0.6, Grok 4.6 — 0.6.

API Cost

GLM-5.3 Flash is 12.3x cheaper: input $0.15/1M vs $2.00/1M tokens.

Context Window

GLM-5.3 Flash supports a larger context: 1M vs 500K tokens.

Recency

GLM-5.3 Flash is newer: released 8/26/2026 vs 8/12/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — GLM-5.3 Flash or Grok 4.6?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — GLM-5.3 Flash or Grok 4.6?
GLM-5.3 Flash is cheaper for input: $0.15 per 1M tokens vs $2.00.
Which has a larger context window — GLM-5.3 Flash or Grok 4.6?
GLM-5.3 Flash supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 500,000.

The GLM-5.3 Flash and Grok 4.6 comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the GLM-5.3 Flash or Grok 4.6 page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.