GLM-5.3 Flash vs Kimi K2.6: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

CharacteristicGLM-5.3 FlashKimi K2.6
CompanyZhipu AIMoonshot AI
Release DateAugust 26, 2026April 20, 2026
Parameters320B1.0T
MultimodalYesYes
Context (input)1.0M262K
Context (output)131K131K
Input Price / 1M$0.15$1.20
Output Price / 1M$0.50$4.50
Average Score0.60.9

Verdict

GLM-5.3 Flash leads in 3 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: GLM-5.3 Flash — 0.6, Kimi K2.6 — 0.9.

API Cost

GLM-5.3 Flash is 8.8x cheaper: input $0.15/1M vs $1.20/1M tokens.

Context Window

GLM-5.3 Flash supports a larger context: 1M vs 262K tokens.

Recency

GLM-5.3 Flash is newer: released 8/26/2026 vs 4/20/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — GLM-5.3 Flash or Kimi K2.6?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — GLM-5.3 Flash or Kimi K2.6?
GLM-5.3 Flash is cheaper for input: $0.15 per 1M tokens vs $1.20.
Which has a larger context window — GLM-5.3 Flash or Kimi K2.6?
GLM-5.3 Flash supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 262,144.

The GLM-5.3 Flash and Kimi K2.6 comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the GLM-5.3 Flash or Kimi K2.6 page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.