GLM-5.3 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B): Specs & Benchmark Comparison
| Characteristic | GLM-5.3 Flash | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Zhipu AI | NVIDIA |
| Release Date | August 26, 2026 | August 11, 2026 |
| Parameters | 320B | 30B |
| Multimodal | Yes | No |
| Context (input) | 1.0M | 262K |
| Context (output) | 131K | 262K |
| Input Price / 1M | $0.15 | $0.05 |
| Output Price / 1M | $0.50 | $0.20 |
| Average Score | 0.6 | 0.8 |
Verdict
GLM-5.3 Flash leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.
Overall Performance
Both models show comparable average scores: GLM-5.3 Flash — 0.6, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) — 0.8.
API Cost
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) is 2.6x cheaper: input $0.05/1M vs $0.15/1M tokens.
Context Window
GLM-5.3 Flash supports a larger context: 1M vs 262K tokens.
Recency
GLM-5.3 Flash is newer: released 8/26/2026 vs 8/11/2026.
More About These Models
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for coding — GLM-5.3 Flash or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B)?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — GLM-5.3 Flash or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B)?
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) is cheaper for input: $0.05 per 1M tokens vs $0.15.
Which has a larger context window — GLM-5.3 Flash or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B)?
GLM-5.3 Flash supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 262,100.
The GLM-5.3 Flash and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the GLM-5.3 Flash or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.