GLM-5.3 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Flash Next: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

GLM-5.3 Flash is developed by Zhipu AI, while Qwen3.8 Flash Next comes from Alibaba. Both were released in August 2026. GLM-5.3 Flash is the larger model at roughly 320 billion parameters, against 180 billion for Qwen3.8 Flash Next.

The two models share 7 published benchmarks. GLM-5.3 Flash leads on 5 of them, Qwen3.8 Flash Next on 2. The widest gaps are on Agents' Last Exam, where Qwen3.8 Flash Next scores 51.2% against 26.3%; HLE w/ Tools, where GLM-5.3 Flash scores 55.3% against 35.9%. Averaged across everything we track, GLM-5.3 Flash sits at 64.1% and Qwen3.8 Flash Next at 67.1%.

On price the two are close: GLM-5.3 Flash costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens, Qwen3.8 Flash Next $0.16 and $0.47. Both accept a context window of about 1M tokens. Both accept text, images, and video as input.

CharacteristicGLM-5.3 FlashQwen3.8 Flash Next
CompanyZhipu AIAlibaba
Release DateAugust 26, 2026August 26, 2026
Parameters320B180B
MultimodalYesYes
Context (input)1.0M1.0M
Context (output)131K66K
Input Price / 1M$0.15$0.16
Output Price / 1M$0.50$0.47
Average Score64.1%67.1%
Benchmarks
Agents' Last Exam26.3%51.2%
HLE w/ Tools55.3%35.9%
Humanity's Last Exam55.3%35.9%
NL2Repo56.3%48.1%
Toolathlon Verified78.4%73.5%
DeepSWE 1.163.4%58.7%
CharXiv-R89.4%90.6%

Visual Benchmark Comparison

GLM-5.3 Flash
Qwen3.8 Flash Next
Agents' Last Exam0.3 vs 0.5
0.3
0.5
HLE w/ Tools0.6 vs 0.4
0.6
0.4
Humanity's Last Exam0.6 vs 0.4
0.6
0.4
NL2Repo0.6 vs 0.5
0.6
0.5
Toolathlon Verified0.8 vs 0.7
0.8
0.7
DeepSWE 1.10.6 vs 0.6
0.6
0.6
CharXiv-R0.9 vs 0.9
0.9
0.9

Verdict

Qwen3.8 Flash Next leads in 1 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: GLM-5.3 Flash — 0.6, Qwen3.8 Flash Next — 0.7.

API Cost

Qwen3.8 Flash Next is 1.0x cheaper: input $0.16/1M vs $0.15/1M tokens.

Context Window

Same context size: 1M tokens.

Recency

Both models were released around the same time: 8/26/2026 and 8/26/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — GLM-5.3 Flash or Qwen3.8 Flash Next?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — GLM-5.3 Flash or Qwen3.8 Flash Next?
GLM-5.3 Flash is cheaper for input: $0.15 per 1M tokens vs $0.16.
Which has a larger context window — GLM-5.3 Flash or Qwen3.8 Flash Next?
GLM-5.3 Flash supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 1,048,576.

The GLM-5.3 Flash and Qwen3.8 Flash Next comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the GLM-5.3 Flash or Qwen3.8 Flash Next page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.