GLM-5.3 Flash vs Sakana Namazu: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

CharacteristicGLM-5.3 FlashSakana Namazu
CompanyZhipu AISakana AI
Release DateAugust 26, 2026August 3, 2026
Parameters320B
MultimodalYesYes
Context (input)1.0M256K
Context (output)131K256K
Input Price / 1M$0.15$0.95
Output Price / 1M$0.50$4.00
Average Score0.60.9

Verdict

GLM-5.3 Flash leads in 3 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: GLM-5.3 Flash — 0.6, Sakana Namazu — 0.9.

API Cost

GLM-5.3 Flash is 7.6x cheaper: input $0.15/1M vs $0.95/1M tokens.

Context Window

GLM-5.3 Flash supports a larger context: 1M vs 256K tokens.

Recency

GLM-5.3 Flash is newer: released 8/26/2026 vs 8/3/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — GLM-5.3 Flash or Sakana Namazu?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — GLM-5.3 Flash or Sakana Namazu?
GLM-5.3 Flash is cheaper for input: $0.15 per 1M tokens vs $0.95.
Which has a larger context window — GLM-5.3 Flash or Sakana Namazu?
GLM-5.3 Flash supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 256,000.

The GLM-5.3 Flash and Sakana Namazu comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the GLM-5.3 Flash or Sakana Namazu page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.