GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.6-27B: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

GLM-5.3 is developed by Zhipu AI, while Qwen3.6-27B comes from Alibaba. Qwen3.6-27B was released in April 2026, and GLM-5.3 followed 4 months later in August 2026. GLM-5.3 is the larger model at roughly 753 billion parameters, against 28 billion for Qwen3.6-27B.

The two models share 2 published benchmarks. GLM-5.3 leads on 2 of them. The widest gaps are on Humanity's Last Exam, where GLM-5.3 scores 62.5% against 24.0%; NL2Repo, where GLM-5.3 scores 58.0% against 36.2%. Averaged across everything we track, GLM-5.3 sits at 52.2% and Qwen3.6-27B at 77.5%.

Qwen3.6-27B is the cheaper API at $0.60 per million input tokens and $3.60 per million output tokens, roughly 2 times cheaper than GLM-5.3 at $1.40 and $4.40. GLM-5.3 takes the larger context window at 1M tokens, compared with 262K for Qwen3.6-27B. GLM-5.3 accepts text as input, while Qwen3.6-27B accepts text and images.

CharacteristicGLM-5.3Qwen3.6-27B
CompanyZhipu AIAlibaba
Release DateAugust 14, 2026April 21, 2026
Parameters753B28B
MultimodalNoYes
Context (input)1.0M262K
Context (output)131K66K
Input Price / 1M$1.40$0.60
Output Price / 1M$4.40$3.60
Average Score52.2%77.5%
Benchmarks
Humanity's Last Exam62.5%24.0%
NL2Repo58.0%36.2%

Visual Benchmark Comparison

GLM-5.3
Qwen3.6-27B
Humanity's Last Exam0.6 vs 0.2
0.6
0.2
NL2Repo0.6 vs 0.4
0.6
0.4

Verdict

GLM-5.3 leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: GLM-5.3 — 0.5, Qwen3.6-27B — 0.8.

API Cost

Qwen3.6-27B is 1.4x cheaper: input $0.60/1M vs $1.40/1M tokens.

Context Window

GLM-5.3 supports a larger context: 1M vs 262K tokens.

Recency

GLM-5.3 is newer: released 8/14/2026 vs 4/21/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — GLM-5.3 or Qwen3.6-27B?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — GLM-5.3 or Qwen3.6-27B?
Qwen3.6-27B is cheaper for input: $0.60 per 1M tokens vs $1.40.
Which has a larger context window — GLM-5.3 or Qwen3.6-27B?
GLM-5.3 supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 262,144.

The GLM-5.3 and Qwen3.6-27B comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the GLM-5.3 or Qwen3.6-27B page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.