GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.8 Flash: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

GLM-5.3 is developed by Zhipu AI, while Qwen3.8 Flash comes from Alibaba. Both were released in August 2026. GLM-5.3 is the larger model at roughly 753 billion parameters, against 125 billion for Qwen3.8 Flash.

The two models share 5 published benchmarks. GLM-5.3 leads on 3 of them, Qwen3.8 Flash on 2. The widest gaps are on Humanity's Last Exam, where GLM-5.3 scores 62.5% against 35.9%; Agents' Last Exam, where Qwen3.8 Flash scores 51.2% against 28.5%. Averaged across everything we track, GLM-5.3 sits at 52.2% and Qwen3.8 Flash at 68.5%.

Qwen3.8 Flash is the cheaper API at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.47 per million output tokens, roughly 9 times cheaper than GLM-5.3 at $1.40 and $4.40. Both accept a context window of about 1M tokens. GLM-5.3 accepts text as input, while Qwen3.8 Flash accepts text, images, and video. On tooling, only GLM-5.3 supports function calling and only GLM-5.3 offers structured output.

CharacteristicGLM-5.3Qwen3.8 Flash
CompanyZhipu AIAlibaba
Release DateAugust 14, 2026August 26, 2026
Parameters753B125B
MultimodalNoYes
Context (input)1.0M1.0M
Context (output)131K131K
Input Price / 1M$1.40$0.15
Output Price / 1M$4.40$0.47
Average Score52.2%68.5%
Benchmarks
Humanity's Last Exam62.5%35.9%
Agents' Last Exam28.5%51.2%
NL2Repo58.0%48.1%
DeepSWE 1.166.9%58.7%
Toolathlon73.0%73.5%

Visual Benchmark Comparison

GLM-5.3
Qwen3.8 Flash
Humanity's Last Exam0.6 vs 0.4
0.6
0.4
Agents' Last Exam0.3 vs 0.5
0.3
0.5
NL2Repo0.6 vs 0.5
0.6
0.5
DeepSWE 1.10.7 vs 0.6
0.7
0.6
Toolathlon0.7 vs 0.7
0.7
0.7

Verdict

Qwen3.8 Flash leads in 1 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: GLM-5.3 — 0.5, Qwen3.8 Flash — 0.7.

API Cost

Qwen3.8 Flash is 9.4x cheaper: input $0.15/1M vs $1.40/1M tokens.

Context Window

Same context size: 1M tokens.

Recency

Both models were released around the same time: 8/14/2026 and 8/26/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — GLM-5.3 or Qwen3.8 Flash?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — GLM-5.3 or Qwen3.8 Flash?
Qwen3.8 Flash is cheaper for input: $0.15 per 1M tokens vs $1.40.
Which has a larger context window — GLM-5.3 or Qwen3.8 Flash?
GLM-5.3 supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 1,048,576.

The GLM-5.3 and Qwen3.8 Flash comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the GLM-5.3 or Qwen3.8 Flash page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.