GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.8 Flash Next: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

GLM-5.3 is developed by Zhipu AI, while Qwen3.8 Flash Next comes from Alibaba. Both were released in August 2026. GLM-5.3 is the larger model at roughly 753 billion parameters, against 180 billion for Qwen3.8 Flash Next.

The two models share 3 published benchmarks. Qwen3.8 Flash Next leads on 2 of them, GLM-5.3 on 1. The widest gaps are on Agents' Last Exam, where Qwen3.8 Flash Next scores 51.2% against 28.5%; DeepSWE 1.1, where GLM-5.3 scores 66.9% against 58.7%. Averaged across everything we track, GLM-5.3 sits at 52.2% and Qwen3.8 Flash Next at 69.7%.

Qwen3.8 Flash Next is the cheaper API at $0.16 per million input tokens and $0.47 per million output tokens, roughly 9 times cheaper than GLM-5.3 at $1.40 and $4.40. Both accept a context window of about 1M tokens. GLM-5.3 accepts text as input, while Qwen3.8 Flash Next accepts text, images, and video.

CharacteristicGLM-5.3Qwen3.8 Flash Next
CompanyZhipu AIAlibaba
Release DateAugust 14, 2026August 26, 2026
Parameters753B180B
MultimodalNoYes
Context (input)1.0M1.0M
Context (output)131K66K
Input Price / 1M$1.40$0.16
Output Price / 1M$4.40$0.47
Average Score52.2%69.7%
Benchmarks
Agents' Last Exam28.5%51.2%
DeepSWE 1.166.9%58.7%
Toolathlon73.0%73.5%

Visual Benchmark Comparison

GLM-5.3
Qwen3.8 Flash Next
Agents' Last Exam0.3 vs 0.5
0.3
0.5
DeepSWE 1.10.7 vs 0.6
0.7
0.6
Toolathlon0.7 vs 0.7
0.7
0.7

Verdict

Qwen3.8 Flash Next leads in 1 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: GLM-5.3 — 0.5, Qwen3.8 Flash Next — 0.7.

API Cost

Qwen3.8 Flash Next is 9.2x cheaper: input $0.16/1M vs $1.40/1M tokens.

Context Window

Same context size: 1M tokens.

Recency

Both models were released around the same time: 8/14/2026 and 8/26/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — GLM-5.3 or Qwen3.8 Flash Next?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — GLM-5.3 or Qwen3.8 Flash Next?
Qwen3.8 Flash Next is cheaper for input: $0.16 per 1M tokens vs $1.40.
Which has a larger context window — GLM-5.3 or Qwen3.8 Flash Next?
GLM-5.3 supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 1,048,576.

The GLM-5.3 and Qwen3.8 Flash Next comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the GLM-5.3 or Qwen3.8 Flash Next page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.