Which is better for coding — GLM-5 or Qwen3.5 27B?

Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.

Which model is cheaper — GLM-5 or Qwen3.5 27B?

API pricing data is available on the individual model pages.

Which has a larger context window — GLM-5 or Qwen3.5 27B?

Context window data is available on the individual model pages.

GLM-5 vs Qwen3.5 27B: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Characteristic	GLM-5	Qwen3.5 27B
Company	Zhipu AI	Alibaba
Release Date	February 10, 2026	March 1, 2026
Parameters	744B	27B
Multimodal	No	No
Context (input)	200K	—
Context (output)	128K	—
Average Score	0.7	0.9

Verdict

Qwen3.5 27B leads in 1 out of 2 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: GLM-5 — 0.7, Qwen3.5 27B — 0.9.

Recency

Qwen3.5 27B is newer: released 3/1/2026 vs 2/10/2026.

More About These Models

GLM-5

Zhipu AI — specs, benchmarks, API

Qwen3.5 27B

Alibaba — specs, benchmarks, API

Related Comparisons

GLM-4.5 vs GLM-5 GLM-4.7-Flash vs GLM-5 Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GLM-5 GLM-5 vs GPT-5.4 nano GLM-5 vs GPT-5.3 Codex GLM-5 vs LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601

All model comparisons →

The GLM-5 and Qwen3.5 27B comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the GLM-5 or Qwen3.5 27B page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.