GPT-5.2 vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

CharacteristicGPT-5.2Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
CompanyOpenAIMeta
Release DateDecember 10, 2025December 6, 2024
Parameters70B
MultimodalYesNo
Context (input)256K128K
Context (output)128K128K
Input Price / 1M$1.50$0.88
Output Price / 1M$6.00$0.88
Average Score1.00.8
Benchmarks
GPQA0.90.5

Visual Benchmark Comparison

GPT-5.2
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
GPQA0.9 vs 0.5
0.9
0.5

Verdict

GPT-5.2 leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: GPT-5.2 — 1.0, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct — 0.8.

API Cost

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is 4.3x cheaper: input $0.88/1M vs $1.50/1M tokens.

Context Window

GPT-5.2 supports a larger context: 256K vs 128K tokens.

Recency

GPT-5.2 is newer: released 12/10/2025 vs 12/6/2024.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — GPT-5.2 or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — GPT-5.2 or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is cheaper for input: $0.88 per 1M tokens vs $1.50.
Which has a larger context window — GPT-5.2 or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?
GPT-5.2 supports a larger context: 256,000 tokens vs 128,000.

The GPT-5.2 and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the GPT-5.2 or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.