Which is better for coding — GPT-5.2 Codex or Step-3.5-Flash?

Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.

Which model is cheaper — GPT-5.2 Codex or Step-3.5-Flash?

Step-3.5-Flash is cheaper for input: $0.10 per 1M tokens vs $1.75.

Which has a larger context window — GPT-5.2 Codex or Step-3.5-Flash?

GPT-5.2 Codex supports a larger context: 400,000 tokens vs 65,536.

GPT-5.2 Codex vs Step-3.5-Flash: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Characteristic	GPT-5.2 Codex	Step-3.5-Flash
Company	OpenAI	StepFun
Release Date	January 13, 2026	February 1, 2026
Parameters	—	196B
Multimodal	Yes	Yes
Context (input)	400K	66K
Context (output)	128K	8K
Input Price / 1M	$1.75	$0.10
Output Price / 1M	$14.00	$0.40
Average Score	0.6	0.8
Benchmarks
Terminal-Bench 2.0	0.6	0.4

Visual Benchmark Comparison

GPT-5.2 Codex

Step-3.5-Flash

Terminal-Bench 2.00.6 vs 0.4

0.6

0.4

Verdict

Step-3.5-Flash leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: GPT-5.2 Codex — 0.6, Step-3.5-Flash — 0.8.

API Cost

Step-3.5-Flash is 31.5x cheaper: input $0.10/1M vs $1.75/1M tokens.

Context Window

GPT-5.2 Codex supports a larger context: 400K vs 66K tokens.

Recency

Step-3.5-Flash is newer: released 2/1/2026 vs 1/13/2026.

More About These Models

GPT-5.2 Codex

OpenAI — specs, benchmarks, API

Step-3.5-Flash

StepFun — specs, benchmarks, API

Related Comparisons

GPT-5.2 Codex vs GPT-5.3 Codex GPT-5.2 Codex vs GPT-5.4 nano GPT-5.2 Codex vs GPT-5.4 mini GPT-5.1 Instant vs GPT-5.2 Codex GPT-5 Medium vs GPT-5.2 Codex GPT-5.1 Thinking vs GPT-5.2 Codex

All model comparisons →

The GPT-5.2 Codex and Step-3.5-Flash comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the GPT-5.2 Codex or Step-3.5-Flash page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.