GPT-5.6 Luna vs Muse Spark 1.1: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

CharacteristicGPT-5.6 LunaMuse Spark 1.1
CompanyOpenAIMeta
Release DateJuly 9, 2026July 9, 2026
Parameters
MultimodalYesYes
Context (input)1.1M1.0M
Context (output)128K131K
Input Price / 1M$0.20$1.25
Output Price / 1M$1.20$4.25
Average Score0.50.8
Benchmarks
Terminal-Bench 2.10.80.8

Visual Benchmark Comparison

GPT-5.6 Luna
Muse Spark 1.1
Terminal-Bench 2.10.8 vs 0.8
0.8
0.8

Verdict

GPT-5.6 Luna leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: GPT-5.6 Luna — 0.5, Muse Spark 1.1 — 0.8.

API Cost

GPT-5.6 Luna is 3.9x cheaper: input $0.20/1M vs $1.25/1M tokens.

Context Window

GPT-5.6 Luna supports a larger context: 1M vs 1M tokens.

Recency

Both models were released around the same time: 7/9/2026 and 7/9/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — GPT-5.6 Luna or Muse Spark 1.1?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — GPT-5.6 Luna or Muse Spark 1.1?
GPT-5.6 Luna is cheaper for input: $0.20 per 1M tokens vs $1.25.
Which has a larger context window — GPT-5.6 Luna or Muse Spark 1.1?
GPT-5.6 Luna supports a larger context: 1,050,000 tokens vs 1,000,000.

The GPT-5.6 Luna and Muse Spark 1.1 comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the GPT-5.6 Luna or Muse Spark 1.1 page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.