GPT-5.6 Luna vs Muse Spark 1.2: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

CharacteristicGPT-5.6 LunaMuse Spark 1.2
CompanyOpenAIMeta
Release DateJuly 9, 2026August 5, 2026
Parameters
MultimodalYesYes
Context (input)1.1M1.0M
Context (output)128K131K
Input Price / 1M$0.20$0.10
Output Price / 1M$1.20$0.20
Average Score0.50.7
Benchmarks
DeepSWE 1.10.70.6
Terminal-Bench 2.10.80.8

Visual Benchmark Comparison

GPT-5.6 Luna
Muse Spark 1.2
DeepSWE 1.10.7 vs 0.6
0.7
0.6
Terminal-Bench 2.10.8 vs 0.8
0.8
0.8

Verdict

Muse Spark 1.2 leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: GPT-5.6 Luna — 0.5, Muse Spark 1.2 — 0.7.

API Cost

Muse Spark 1.2 is 4.7x cheaper: input $0.10/1M vs $0.20/1M tokens.

Context Window

GPT-5.6 Luna supports a larger context: 1M vs 1M tokens.

Recency

Muse Spark 1.2 is newer: released 8/5/2026 vs 7/9/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — GPT-5.6 Luna or Muse Spark 1.2?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — GPT-5.6 Luna or Muse Spark 1.2?
Muse Spark 1.2 is cheaper for input: $0.10 per 1M tokens vs $0.20.
Which has a larger context window — GPT-5.6 Luna or Muse Spark 1.2?
GPT-5.6 Luna supports a larger context: 1,050,000 tokens vs 1,000,000.

The GPT-5.6 Luna and Muse Spark 1.2 comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the GPT-5.6 Luna or Muse Spark 1.2 page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.