GPT-5.6 Luna vs Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

CharacteristicGPT-5.6 LunaQwen3 VL 4B Thinking
CompanyOpenAIAlibaba
Release DateJuly 9, 2026September 22, 2025
Parameters4B
MultimodalYesYes
Context (input)1.1M262K
Context (output)128K262K
Input Price / 1M$0.20$0.10
Output Price / 1M$1.20$1.00
Average Score0.50.9

Verdict

GPT-5.6 Luna leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: GPT-5.6 Luna — 0.5, Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking — 0.9.

API Cost

Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking is 1.3x cheaper: input $0.10/1M vs $0.20/1M tokens.

Context Window

GPT-5.6 Luna supports a larger context: 1M vs 262K tokens.

Recency

GPT-5.6 Luna is newer: released 7/9/2026 vs 9/22/2025.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — GPT-5.6 Luna or Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — GPT-5.6 Luna or Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking?
Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking is cheaper for input: $0.10 per 1M tokens vs $0.20.
Which has a larger context window — GPT-5.6 Luna or Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking?
GPT-5.6 Luna supports a larger context: 1,050,000 tokens vs 262,144.

The GPT-5.6 Luna and Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the GPT-5.6 Luna or Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.