GPT-5.6 Terra vs Qwen3.8 Flash: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

CharacteristicGPT-5.6 TerraQwen3.8 Flash
CompanyOpenAIAlibaba
Release DateJuly 9, 2026August 26, 2026
Parameters125B
MultimodalYesYes
Context (input)1.1M1.0M
Context (output)128K131K
Input Price / 1M$2.00$0.15
Output Price / 1M$12.00$0.47
Average Score0.60.7
Benchmarks
OSWorld 2.00.50.2
Toolathlon0.50.7
DeepSWE 1.10.70.6
GPQA0.90.9
SWE-Bench Pro0.60.6
Agents' Last Exam0.50.5

Visual Benchmark Comparison

GPT-5.6 Terra
Qwen3.8 Flash
OSWorld 2.00.5 vs 0.2
0.5
0.2
Toolathlon0.5 vs 0.7
0.5
0.7
DeepSWE 1.10.7 vs 0.6
0.7
0.6
GPQA0.9 vs 0.9
0.9
0.9
SWE-Bench Pro0.6 vs 0.6
0.6
0.6
Agents' Last Exam0.5 vs 0.5
0.5
0.5

Verdict

Qwen3.8 Flash leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: GPT-5.6 Terra — 0.6, Qwen3.8 Flash — 0.7.

API Cost

Qwen3.8 Flash is 22.6x cheaper: input $0.15/1M vs $2.00/1M tokens.

Context Window

GPT-5.6 Terra supports a larger context: 1M vs 1M tokens.

Recency

Qwen3.8 Flash is newer: released 8/26/2026 vs 7/9/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — GPT-5.6 Terra or Qwen3.8 Flash?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — GPT-5.6 Terra or Qwen3.8 Flash?
Qwen3.8 Flash is cheaper for input: $0.15 per 1M tokens vs $2.00.
Which has a larger context window — GPT-5.6 Terra or Qwen3.8 Flash?
GPT-5.6 Terra supports a larger context: 1,050,000 tokens vs 1,048,576.

The GPT-5.6 Terra and Qwen3.8 Flash comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the GPT-5.6 Terra or Qwen3.8 Flash page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.