GPT-6 Astra vs Qwen3.8 Flash: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

CharacteristicGPT-6 AstraQwen3.8 Flash
CompanyOpenAIAlibaba
Release DateSeptember 3, 2026August 26, 2026
Parameters125B
MultimodalYesYes
Context (input)1.1M1.0M
Context (output)128K131K
Input Price / 1M$10.00$0.15
Output Price / 1M$50.00$0.47
Average Score0.70.7
Benchmarks
OSWorld 2.00.70.2
DeepSWE 1.10.70.6
Agents' Last Exam0.60.5
GPQA Diamond1.00.9

Visual Benchmark Comparison

GPT-6 Astra
Qwen3.8 Flash
OSWorld 2.00.7 vs 0.2
0.7
0.2
DeepSWE 1.10.7 vs 0.6
0.7
0.6
Agents' Last Exam0.6 vs 0.5
0.6
0.5
GPQA Diamond1.0 vs 0.9
1.0
0.9

Verdict

Both models show equal results — the choice depends on your specific use case.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: GPT-6 Astra — 0.7, Qwen3.8 Flash — 0.7.

API Cost

Qwen3.8 Flash is 96.8x cheaper: input $0.15/1M vs $10.00/1M tokens.

Context Window

GPT-6 Astra supports a larger context: 1M vs 1M tokens.

Recency

Both models were released around the same time: 9/3/2026 and 8/26/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — GPT-6 Astra or Qwen3.8 Flash?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — GPT-6 Astra or Qwen3.8 Flash?
Qwen3.8 Flash is cheaper for input: $0.15 per 1M tokens vs $10.00.
Which has a larger context window — GPT-6 Astra or Qwen3.8 Flash?
GPT-6 Astra supports a larger context: 1,050,000 tokens vs 1,048,576.

The GPT-6 Astra and Qwen3.8 Flash comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the GPT-6 Astra or Qwen3.8 Flash page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.