GPT-6.1 Sol vs Ling 3.1 Flash: Specs & Benchmark Comparison
GPT-6.1 Sol is developed by OpenAI, while Ling 3.1 Flash comes from InclusionAI. Both were released in September 2026. Ling 3.1 Flash has a published size of about 560 billion parameters; OpenAI has not disclosed the parameter count of GPT-6.1 Sol.
We have 17 benchmark results for GPT-6.1 Sol and 11 benchmark results for Ling 3.1 Flash, but they overlap on a single test: HealthBench Professional, where Ling 3.1 Flash scores 65.3% against 64.2%.
GPT-6.1 Sol is available through an API at $2 per million input tokens with a 1M-token context window. We do not track a hosted API for Ling 3.1 Flash, so pricing and context cannot be compared directly.
| Characteristic | GPT-6.1 Sol | Ling 3.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Company | OpenAI | InclusionAI |
| Release Date | September 29, 2026 | September 30, 2026 |
| Parameters | — | 560B |
| Multimodal | Yes | No |
| Context (input) | 1.1M | — |
| Context (output) | 128K | — |
| Input Price / 1M | $2.00 | — |
| Output Price / 1M | $10.00 | — |
| Average Score | 62.8% | 65.0% |
| Benchmarks | ||
| HealthBench Professional | 64.2% | 65.3% |
Visual Benchmark Comparison
Verdict
Both models show equal results — the choice depends on your specific use case.
Both models show comparable average scores: GPT-6.1 Sol — 0.6, Ling 3.1 Flash — 0.6.
Both models were released around the same time: 9/29/2026 and 9/30/2026.
More About These Models
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for coding — GPT-6.1 Sol or Ling 3.1 Flash?
Which model is cheaper — GPT-6.1 Sol or Ling 3.1 Flash?
Which has a larger context window — GPT-6.1 Sol or Ling 3.1 Flash?
The GPT-6.1 Sol and Ling 3.1 Flash comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the GPT-6.1 Sol or Ling 3.1 Flash page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.