Grok 4 Fast vs K-EXAONE-236B-A23B: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

CharacteristicGrok 4 FastK-EXAONE-236B-A23B
CompanyxAILG AI Research
Release DateAugust 27, 2025December 30, 2025
Parameters236B
MultimodalYesNo
Context (input)2.0M33K
Context (output)30K33K
Input Price / 1M$0.20$0.60
Output Price / 1M$0.50$1.00
Average Score0.80.8
Benchmarks
AIME 20250.90.9

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Grok 4 Fast
K-EXAONE-236B-A23B
AIME 20250.9 vs 0.9
0.9
0.9

Verdict

Grok 4 Fast leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Grok 4 Fast — 0.8, K-EXAONE-236B-A23B — 0.8.

API Cost

Grok 4 Fast is 2.3x cheaper: input $0.20/1M vs $0.60/1M tokens.

Context Window

Grok 4 Fast supports a larger context: 2M vs 33K tokens.

Recency

K-EXAONE-236B-A23B is newer: released 12/30/2025 vs 8/27/2025.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Grok 4 Fast or K-EXAONE-236B-A23B?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Grok 4 Fast or K-EXAONE-236B-A23B?
Grok 4 Fast is cheaper for input: $0.20 per 1M tokens vs $0.60.
Which has a larger context window — Grok 4 Fast or K-EXAONE-236B-A23B?
Grok 4 Fast supports a larger context: 2,000,000 tokens vs 32,768.

The Grok 4 Fast and K-EXAONE-236B-A23B comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Grok 4 Fast or K-EXAONE-236B-A23B page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.