Grok 4 Fast vs MiniMax M2.1: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

CharacteristicGrok 4 FastMiniMax M2.1
CompanyxAIMiniMax
Release DateAugust 27, 2025December 22, 2025
Parameters
MultimodalYesNo
Context (input)2.0M1.0M
Context (output)30K100K
Input Price / 1M$0.20$0.30
Output Price / 1M$0.50$1.20
Average Score0.80.9
Benchmarks
GPQA0.90.8

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Grok 4 Fast
MiniMax M2.1
GPQA0.9 vs 0.8
0.9
0.8

Verdict

Grok 4 Fast leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Grok 4 Fast — 0.8, MiniMax M2.1 — 0.9.

API Cost

Grok 4 Fast is 2.1x cheaper: input $0.20/1M vs $0.30/1M tokens.

Context Window

Grok 4 Fast supports a larger context: 2M vs 1M tokens.

Recency

MiniMax M2.1 is newer: released 12/22/2025 vs 8/27/2025.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Grok 4 Fast or MiniMax M2.1?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Grok 4 Fast or MiniMax M2.1?
Grok 4 Fast is cheaper for input: $0.20 per 1M tokens vs $0.30.
Which has a larger context window — Grok 4 Fast or MiniMax M2.1?
Grok 4 Fast supports a larger context: 2,000,000 tokens vs 1,000,000.

The Grok 4 Fast and MiniMax M2.1 comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Grok 4 Fast or MiniMax M2.1 page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.