Grok 4.5 vs Laguna S 2.1: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

CharacteristicGrok 4.5Laguna S 2.1
CompanyxAIPoolside
Release DateJuly 16, 2026July 21, 2026
Parameters118B
MultimodalYesNo
Context (input)500K1.0M
Input Price / 1M$2.00$0.10
Output Price / 1M$6.00$0.20
Average Score0.80.6
Benchmarks
Terminal-Bench 2.10.80.7
SWE-Bench Pro0.70.6

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Grok 4.5
Laguna S 2.1
Terminal-Bench 2.10.8 vs 0.7
0.8
0.7
SWE-Bench Pro0.7 vs 0.6
0.7
0.6

Verdict

Laguna S 2.1 leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Grok 4.5 — 0.8, Laguna S 2.1 — 0.6.

API Cost

Laguna S 2.1 is 26.7x cheaper: input $0.10/1M vs $2.00/1M tokens.

Context Window

Laguna S 2.1 supports a larger context: 1M vs 500K tokens.

Recency

Both models were released around the same time: 7/16/2026 and 7/21/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Grok 4.5 or Laguna S 2.1?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Grok 4.5 or Laguna S 2.1?
Laguna S 2.1 is cheaper for input: $0.10 per 1M tokens vs $2.00.
Which has a larger context window — Grok 4.5 or Laguna S 2.1?
Laguna S 2.1 supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 500,000.

The Grok 4.5 and Laguna S 2.1 comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Grok 4.5 or Laguna S 2.1 page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.