Grok 4.5 vs LFM2.5-2.6B: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Grok 4.5 is developed by xAI, while LFM2.5-2.6B comes from Liquid AI. Grok 4.5 was released in July 2026, and LFM2.5-2.6B followed a month later in August 2026. LFM2.5-2.6B has a published size of about 3 billion parameters; xAI has not disclosed the parameter count of Grok 4.5.

We have 15 benchmark results for Grok 4.5 and 8 benchmark results for LFM2.5-2.6B, but they overlap on a single test: Tau3 Banking, where Grok 4.5 scores 33.0% against 5.7%.

Grok 4.5 is available through an API at $2 per million input tokens with a 500K-token context window. We do not track a hosted API for LFM2.5-2.6B, so pricing and context cannot be compared directly.

CharacteristicGrok 4.5LFM2.5-2.6B
CompanyxAILiquid AI
Release DateJuly 16, 2026August 4, 2026
Parameters3B
MultimodalYesNo
Context (input)500K
Input Price / 1M$2.00
Output Price / 1M$6.00
Average Score52.9%55.5%
Benchmarks
Tau3 Banking33.0%5.7%

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Grok 4.5
LFM2.5-2.6B
Tau3 Banking0.3 vs 0.1
0.3
0.1

Verdict

LFM2.5-2.6B leads in 1 out of 2 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Grok 4.5 — 0.5, LFM2.5-2.6B — 0.6.

Recency

LFM2.5-2.6B is newer: released 8/4/2026 vs 7/16/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Grok 4.5 or LFM2.5-2.6B?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Grok 4.5 or LFM2.5-2.6B?
API pricing data is available on the individual model pages.
Which has a larger context window — Grok 4.5 or LFM2.5-2.6B?
Context window data is available on the individual model pages.

The Grok 4.5 and LFM2.5-2.6B comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Grok 4.5 or LFM2.5-2.6B page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.