Grok 4.5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash Next: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Grok 4.5 is developed by xAI, while Qwen3.8 Flash Next comes from Alibaba. Grok 4.5 was released in July 2026, and Qwen3.8 Flash Next followed a month later in August 2026. Qwen3.8 Flash Next has a published size of about 180 billion parameters; xAI has not disclosed the parameter count of Grok 4.5.

The two models share 3 published benchmarks. Grok 4.5 leads on 2 of them, Qwen3.8 Flash Next on 1. The widest gaps are on DeepSWE 1.1, where Qwen3.8 Flash Next scores 58.7% against 54.0%; SWE-Bench Pro, where Grok 4.5 scores 65.0% against 62.5%. Averaged across everything we track, Grok 4.5 sits at 52.9% and Qwen3.8 Flash Next at 69.7%.

Qwen3.8 Flash Next is the cheaper API at $0.16 per million input tokens and $0.47 per million output tokens, roughly 13 times cheaper than Grok 4.5 at $2 and $6. Qwen3.8 Flash Next takes the larger context window at 1M tokens, compared with 500K for Grok 4.5. Grok 4.5 accepts text and images as input, while Qwen3.8 Flash Next accepts text, images, and video.

CharacteristicGrok 4.5Qwen3.8 Flash Next
CompanyxAIAlibaba
Release DateJuly 16, 2026August 26, 2026
Parameters180B
MultimodalYesYes
Context (input)500K1.0M
Context (output)66K
Input Price / 1M$2.00$0.16
Output Price / 1M$6.00$0.47
Average Score52.9%69.7%
Benchmarks
DeepSWE 1.154.0%58.7%
SWE-Bench Pro65.0%62.5%
GPQA93.0%91.7%

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Grok 4.5
Qwen3.8 Flash Next
DeepSWE 1.10.5 vs 0.6
0.5
0.6
SWE-Bench Pro0.7 vs 0.6
0.7
0.6
GPQA0.9 vs 0.9
0.9
0.9

Verdict

Qwen3.8 Flash Next leads in 3 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Grok 4.5 — 0.5, Qwen3.8 Flash Next — 0.7.

API Cost

Qwen3.8 Flash Next is 12.7x cheaper: input $0.16/1M vs $2.00/1M tokens.

Context Window

Qwen3.8 Flash Next supports a larger context: 1M vs 500K tokens.

Recency

Qwen3.8 Flash Next is newer: released 8/26/2026 vs 7/16/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Grok 4.5 or Qwen3.8 Flash Next?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Grok 4.5 or Qwen3.8 Flash Next?
Qwen3.8 Flash Next is cheaper for input: $0.16 per 1M tokens vs $2.00.
Which has a larger context window — Grok 4.5 or Qwen3.8 Flash Next?
Qwen3.8 Flash Next supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 500,000.

The Grok 4.5 and Qwen3.8 Flash Next comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Grok 4.5 or Qwen3.8 Flash Next page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.