Grok 4.6 vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Grok 4.6 is developed by xAI, while Ling 3.0 Flash Fin comes from InclusionAI. Grok 4.6 was released in August 2026, and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin followed a month later in September 2026. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin has a published size of about 124 billion parameters; xAI has not disclosed the parameter count of Grok 4.6.

We have 11 benchmark results for Grok 4.6 and 6 benchmark results for Ling 3.0 Flash Fin, but they overlap on a single test: APEX-Agents, where Grok 4.6 scores 57.5% against 29.2%.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is the cheaper API at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.18 per million output tokens, roughly 33 times cheaper than Grok 4.6 at $2 and $6. Grok 4.6 takes the larger context window at 500K tokens, compared with 262K for Ling 3.0 Flash Fin. Grok 4.6 accepts text and images as input, while Ling 3.0 Flash Fin accepts text. On tooling, only Grok 4.6 supports function calling and only Grok 4.6 offers structured output.

CharacteristicGrok 4.6Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
CompanyxAIInclusionAI
Release DateAugust 12, 2026September 3, 2026
Parameters124B
MultimodalYesNo
Context (input)500K262K
Context (output)262K
Input Price / 1M$2.00$0.06
Output Price / 1M$6.00$0.18
Average Score49.6%51.2%
Benchmarks
APEX-Agents57.5%29.2%

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Grok 4.6
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
APEX-Agents0.6 vs 0.3
0.6
0.3

Verdict

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Grok 4.6 — 0.5, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin — 0.5.

API Cost

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 33.3x cheaper: input $0.06/1M vs $2.00/1M tokens.

Context Window

Grok 4.6 supports a larger context: 500K vs 262K tokens.

Recency

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is newer: released 9/3/2026 vs 8/12/2026.

More About These Models

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Grok 4.6 or Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Grok 4.6 or Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is cheaper for input: $0.06 per 1M tokens vs $2.00.
Which has a larger context window — Grok 4.6 or Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?
Grok 4.6 supports a larger context: 500,000 tokens vs 262,144.

The Grok 4.6 and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Grok 4.6 or Ling 3.0 Flash Fin page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.