Grok 4.6 vs Qwen3.8 Flash: Specs & Benchmark Comparison
| Characteristic | Grok 4.6 | Qwen3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Company | xAI | Alibaba |
| Release Date | August 12, 2026 | August 26, 2026 |
| Parameters | — | 125B |
| Multimodal | Yes | Yes |
| Context (input) | 500K | 1.0M |
| Context (output) | — | 131K |
| Input Price / 1M | $2.00 | $0.15 |
| Output Price / 1M | $6.00 | $0.47 |
| Average Score | 0.6 | 0.7 |
| Benchmarks | ||
| DeepSWE 1.1 | 0.7 | 0.6 |
Visual Benchmark Comparison
Grok 4.6
Qwen3.8 Flash
DeepSWE 1.10.7 vs 0.6
0.7
0.6
Verdict
Qwen3.8 Flash leads in 3 out of 4 comparison categories.
Overall Performance
Both models show comparable average scores: Grok 4.6 — 0.6, Qwen3.8 Flash — 0.7.
API Cost
Qwen3.8 Flash is 12.9x cheaper: input $0.15/1M vs $2.00/1M tokens.
Context Window
Qwen3.8 Flash supports a larger context: 1M vs 500K tokens.
Recency
Qwen3.8 Flash is newer: released 8/26/2026 vs 8/12/2026.
More About These Models
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for coding — Grok 4.6 or Qwen3.8 Flash?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Grok 4.6 or Qwen3.8 Flash?
Qwen3.8 Flash is cheaper for input: $0.15 per 1M tokens vs $2.00.
Which has a larger context window — Grok 4.6 or Qwen3.8 Flash?
Qwen3.8 Flash supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 500,000.
The Grok 4.6 and Qwen3.8 Flash comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Grok 4.6 or Qwen3.8 Flash page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.