Hy3 vs LFM2.5-2.6B: Specs & Benchmark Comparison
Hy3 is developed by Tencent, while LFM2.5-2.6B comes from Liquid AI. Hy3 was released in July 2026, and LFM2.5-2.6B followed a month later in August 2026. Hy3 is the larger model at roughly 295 billion parameters, against 3 billion for LFM2.5-2.6B.
We have 31 benchmark results for Hy3 and 8 benchmark results for LFM2.5-2.6B, but they overlap on a single test: Claw-Eval, where Hy3 scores 68.5% against 62.8%.
| Characteristic | Hy3 | LFM2.5-2.6B |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Tencent | Liquid AI |
| Release Date | July 6, 2026 | August 4, 2026 |
| Parameters | 295B | 3B |
| Multimodal | No | No |
| Average Score | 57.1% | 55.5% |
| Benchmarks | ||
| Claw-Eval | 68.5% | 62.8% |
Visual Benchmark Comparison
Verdict
LFM2.5-2.6B leads in 1 out of 2 comparison categories.
Both models show comparable average scores: Hy3 — 0.6, LFM2.5-2.6B — 0.6.
LFM2.5-2.6B is newer: released 8/4/2026 vs 7/6/2026.
More About These Models
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for coding — Hy3 or LFM2.5-2.6B?
Which model is cheaper — Hy3 or LFM2.5-2.6B?
Which has a larger context window — Hy3 or LFM2.5-2.6B?
The Hy3 and LFM2.5-2.6B comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Hy3 or LFM2.5-2.6B page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.