Hy3 vs Muse Glimmer-30B: Specs & Benchmark Comparison
| Characteristic | Hy3 | Muse Glimmer-30B |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Tencent | Meta |
| Release Date | July 6, 2026 | August 10, 2026 |
| Parameters | 295B | 30B |
| Multimodal | No | Yes |
| Average Score | 0.6 | 0.7 |
| Benchmarks | ||
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 0.7 | 0.5 |
| DeepSearchQA | 0.9 | 0.7 |
| SkillsBench | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| GPQA | 0.9 | 0.8 |
| SWE-Bench Pro | 0.6 | 0.5 |
| AA-LCR | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| WildClawBench | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| MCP Atlas | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| SWE-Bench Verified | 0.8 | 0.8 |
Visual Benchmark Comparison
Hy3
Muse Glimmer-30B
Terminal-Bench 2.10.7 vs 0.5
0.7
0.5
DeepSearchQA0.9 vs 0.7
0.9
0.7
SkillsBench0.6 vs 0.4
0.6
0.4
GPQA0.9 vs 0.8
0.9
0.8
SWE-Bench Pro0.6 vs 0.5
0.6
0.5
AA-LCR0.7 vs 0.8
0.7
0.8
WildClawBench0.5 vs 0.5
0.5
0.5
MCP Atlas0.8 vs 0.8
0.8
0.8
SWE-Bench Verified0.8 vs 0.8
0.8
0.8
Verdict
Muse Glimmer-30B leads in 1 out of 3 comparison categories.
Overall Performance
Both models show comparable average scores: Hy3 — 0.6, Muse Glimmer-30B — 0.7.
Programming
On SWE-Bench, both models are nearly equal: Hy3 — 0.8, Muse Glimmer-30B — 0.8.
Recency
Muse Glimmer-30B is newer: released 8/10/2026 vs 7/6/2026.
More About These Models
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for coding — Hy3 or Muse Glimmer-30B?
On the SWE-Bench benchmark, Hy3 shows a better result: 0.8 vs 0.8.
Which model is cheaper — Hy3 or Muse Glimmer-30B?
API pricing data is available on the individual model pages.
Which has a larger context window — Hy3 or Muse Glimmer-30B?
Context window data is available on the individual model pages.
The Hy3 and Muse Glimmer-30B comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Hy3 or Muse Glimmer-30B page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.