Kimi K2.6 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B): Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Kimi K2.6 is developed by Moonshot AI, while Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) comes from NVIDIA. Kimi K2.6 was released in April 2026, and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) followed 4 months later in August 2026. Kimi K2.6 is the larger model at roughly 1.0 trillion parameters, against 30 billion for Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B).

The two models share 6 published benchmarks. Kimi K2.6 leads on 6 of them. The widest gaps are on BrowseComp, where Kimi K2.6 scores 86.3% against 37.0%; SWE-bench Multilingual, where Kimi K2.6 scores 76.7% against 39.3%. Averaged across everything we track, Kimi K2.6 sits at 71.2% and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) at 45.3%.

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) is the cheaper API at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens, roughly 24 times cheaper than Kimi K2.6 at $1.20 and $4.50. Both accept a context window of about 262K tokens. Kimi K2.6 accepts text and images as input, while Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) accepts text.

CharacteristicKimi K2.6Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B)
CompanyMoonshot AINVIDIA
Release DateApril 20, 2026August 11, 2026
Parameters1.0T30B
MultimodalYesNo
Context (input)262K262K
Context (output)131K262K
Input Price / 1M$1.20$0.05
Output Price / 1M$4.50$0.20
Average Score71.2%45.3%
Benchmarks
BrowseComp86.3%37.0%
SWE-bench Multilingual76.7%39.3%
SWE-Bench Verified80.2%51.6%
Humanity's Last Exam36.4%11.7%
SciCode52.2%32.6%
GPQA90.5%75.0%

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Kimi K2.6
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B)
BrowseComp0.9 vs 0.4
0.9
0.4
SWE-bench Multilingual0.8 vs 0.4
0.8
0.4
SWE-Bench Verified0.8 vs 0.5
0.8
0.5
Humanity's Last Exam0.4 vs 0.1
0.4
0.1
SciCode0.5 vs 0.3
0.5
0.3
GPQA0.9 vs 0.8
0.9
0.8

Verdict

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) leads in 2 out of 5 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Kimi K2.6 — 0.7, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) — 0.5.

Programming

On SWE-Bench, both models are nearly equal: Kimi K2.6 — 0.8, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) — 0.5.

API Cost

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) is 22.8x cheaper: input $0.05/1M vs $1.20/1M tokens.

Context Window

Kimi K2.6 supports a larger context: 262K vs 262K tokens.

Recency

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) is newer: released 8/11/2026 vs 4/20/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Kimi K2.6 or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B)?
On the SWE-Bench benchmark, Kimi K2.6 shows a better result: 80.2% vs 51.6%.
Which model is cheaper — Kimi K2.6 or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B)?
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) is cheaper for input: $0.05 per 1M tokens vs $1.20.
Which has a larger context window — Kimi K2.6 or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B)?
Kimi K2.6 supports a larger context: 262,144 tokens vs 262,100.

The Kimi K2.6 and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Kimi K2.6 or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.