Kimi K2.6 vs Sakana Namazu: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

CharacteristicKimi K2.6Sakana Namazu
CompanyMoonshot AISakana AI
Release DateApril 20, 2026August 3, 2026
Parameters1.0T
MultimodalYesYes
Context (input)262K256K
Context (output)131K256K
Input Price / 1M$1.20$0.95
Output Price / 1M$4.50$4.00
Average Score0.90.9
Benchmarks
AIME 20261.01.0

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Kimi K2.6
Sakana Namazu
AIME 20261.0 vs 1.0
1.0
1.0

Verdict

Sakana Namazu leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Kimi K2.6 — 0.9, Sakana Namazu — 0.9.

API Cost

Sakana Namazu is 1.2x cheaper: input $0.95/1M vs $1.20/1M tokens.

Context Window

Kimi K2.6 supports a larger context: 262K vs 256K tokens.

Recency

Sakana Namazu is newer: released 8/3/2026 vs 4/20/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Kimi K2.6 or Sakana Namazu?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Kimi K2.6 or Sakana Namazu?
Sakana Namazu is cheaper for input: $0.95 per 1M tokens vs $1.20.
Which has a larger context window — Kimi K2.6 or Sakana Namazu?
Kimi K2.6 supports a larger context: 262,144 tokens vs 256,000.

The Kimi K2.6 and Sakana Namazu comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Kimi K2.6 or Sakana Namazu page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.